Comments on: Dora and Eliza converse http://cms.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26 an electronic literature symposium Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:26:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.2 By: Blog Comment Poster http://cms.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-18 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:58:22 +0000 http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-18 To be honest, all this stuff about sounds confusing for me…

]]> By: davin http://cms.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-17 Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:53:29 +0000 http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-17 “But what is, qualitative judgement? In the Turing test hypothesis, where is the qualitative judgement about intelligence located? Is it the analyst, for example, who makes the judgement or is it the analyst (the very condition of analyst as the possessor of some agency, instrumental intelligence, and therefore–why not?–humanity) who becomes a subject of being-judged, or rather of being placed in question (not by an ego, but simply by a conspiracy of protocols)?”
–Armand, Louis. Literate Technologies. Prague: Litteraria Pragensia, 2006. 129.

Helen, you should track down a copy of Louis’ book (or email him).

]]>